domingo, 9 de septiembre de 2007

Fair Testing of Apes


Comment by Frans B. M. de Waal, Ph. D., Director, Living Links, EMORY University


This study claims that apes have equal technical but lower social intelligence than human toddlers. Although it is an impressive battery of tests, and an impressive data analysis, there is a glaring lack of equivalence between the way the children and apes have been tested, one that has been criticized before by others and myself.

It may seem that testing all subjects in the same way is fair and equal, but the children are tested by their own species (a human model), whereas the apes are tested by a stranger of another species (a human model). It is entirely possible that this doesn't make much difference in physical tasks, which after all focus on physical objects, but we do know that it makes a huge difference in relation to social tasks, which by definition focus on the interaction between subject and experimenter.

It is easier to process social information of one's own species. So, it is only seemingly that all subjects were tested in the same way.

Here at the Living Links Center we have in the past five years conducted many tests, which demonstrate that if chimpanzees are tested with their own kind they show impressive social learning. We have specialized in chimp-to-chimp testing precisely to circumvent the confound introduced by the human tester.

Examples can be found on the website of Living Links:
http://www.emory.edu/LIVING_LINKS/diffus.html
http://www.emory.edu/LIVING_LINKS/conform.html

Our results don't fit the "cultural intelligence" hypothesis mentioned in the study, and in fact they contradict the central claim of this new study, because they demonstrate that apes are very good at social tasks. Testing apes with models of their own species takes more time and patience, hence is harder to integrate in a large battery of tests, but it is ecologically more relevant (that is, it relates more closely to the context in which primate cognition evolved, which is of course among members of the same species).

So, unless I see more evidence, my conclusion is that all that this new study demonstrates is how cognitive performance is sensitive to who does the testing: one's own or another species.

Babies and Chimps Compete in Mental Olympics




While The Lede considered Man versus Machine, scientists were studying another historic duel: Baby versus Chimp.

106 chimpanzees, 32 orangutans and 105 humans who were about 2.5 years old were put through “The Primate Cognition Test Battery,” which includes 16 tasks divided between physical and social cognition. Here’s how the authors of the study in the journal Science described the difference:

Physical cognition deals with inanimate objects and their spatial-temporal-causal relations, whereas social cognition deals with other animate beings and their intentional actions, perceptions, and knowledge.

Now brace yourselves, human readers: The babies did not trounce the apes. In fact, chimpanzees scored more correct responses in the tests on causality and just about tied on spatial skills, according to this chart.

But the social learning tests were a rout for the babies, with chimpanzees way behind and orangutans apparently shut out. Reuters outlines how one social learning test went:

A researcher showed the children and apes how to pop open a plastic tube to get food or a toy contained inside. The children observed and imitated the solution. Chimpanzees and orangutans, however, tried to smash open the tube or yank out the contents with their teeth.

Despite the mixed results, Time magazine sounded uplifted. After all, the results suggested that we are special because we “cooperate and share expertise.” And that’s what “has allowed us to build complex societies, collaborate and learn from each other at a high level.”

Why did the monkey pee on his feet?

Published online: 7 September 2007; | doi:10.1038/news070903-18


Study helps to answer question of odd primate behaviour.

Matt Kaplan






Monkey pee: rubbing urine on the hands could be a way of seeking attention.

Katalin Laszlo
It may seem strange, but many monkeys wash their hands and feet with urine. Researchers now think they know why.

Since this odd behaviour was first observed, explanatory theories have varied wildly from suggesting that it helps monkeys improve their grip when climbing to saying it is a method of cleaning. One widely supported theory argues that monkeys use urine washing to cool themselves down when temperatures get too high.

But new research hints that it's all about social communication.

The notion of animals using chemical scents to communicate with each other is hardly new. Dogs classically use urine to mark their territory, for example, as do many other creatures. But when it comes to peeing on oneself, researchers had thought physiological reasons might be as important as social ones. It seems they were wrong.

Hot times

Primatologist Kimran Miller and her research colleagues at the National Institutes of Health Animal Center in Poolesville, Maryland, monitored capuchin monkeys for ten months in a captive environment. The researchers would record daily the enclosure temperature and humidity and then note rates of urine washing. Their report, to be published in the American Journal of Primatology, shows that urine washing behaviours did not change with either temperature or humidity.

Instead, Miller and her team noticed a link between urine washing and attention-seeking.

Alpha males, for example, doubled their urine washing rates when being solicited by females. The researchers think this might be how males encourage females to continue paying attention once they've started.

And in 87% of fights or aggressive incidents, the loser of the battle washed in urine. The team suspects that this is also an attention-seeking behaviour — in this case seeking sympathy. But more research is needed to be sure.







"This really challenges the dominant theory that urine washing in capuchins is related to thermoregulation," comments primatologist James Anderson at the University of Stirling in Scotland.

"We see antelope that pee on their throats, vultures that poop on their feet, and monkeys that wash their hands in urine," says behavioural endocrinologist Fred Bercovitch at the centre for Conservation and Research for Endangered Species in San Diego. "It's obvious that urination is about more than elimination and it is great to see research like this that is figuring out why."


Social skills help toddlers outstrip apes in intelligence tests

Apes may be our closest relatives in the animal world, but in the battle of wits human toddlers are walking tall while their hairy ancestors are still dragging their knuckles.

In a study comparing the abilities of two-year-olds with chimpanzees and orang-utans, children surpassed the apes in social learning skills, researchers found. The findings are likely to lend further credence to the theory that higher social ability is a uniquely human trait, setting us apart from other primates.

Some 105 youngsters and 138 apes were subjected to a battery of cognitive tests over a two-week period during the study. The researchers found that the children were far more advanced than the apes in understanding nonverbal communications, copying solutions to a problem and understanding the intentions of others.

Esther Herrmann, of the Max Planck institute for evolutionary anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, who led the study, said: "This is the first time that anything like this has been done. We compared three species to determine which skills and abilities are distinctively human.

"Social cognition skills are critical for learning. Young human children who had been walking and talking for about one year, but who were still several years away from literacy and formal schooling, far outstripped both chimpanzees and orang-utans on tasks of social cognition."

In one learning test, human children and apes were shown how to pop open a plastic tube to get food or a toy contained inside. While the children watched and imitated the solution, the baffled chimps and orang-utans, tried to smash open the tube or yank out the contents with their teeth.

The toddlers were also better at following an adult's gaze and at pointing towards a cup containing a reward.

Human brains are three times bigger than those of the closest primate relatives. The researchers believe the results could provide crucial insight into cognitive evolution since the human and chimp family trees diverged around 6m years ago. Chimpanzees are considered the closest genetic relatives to humans, with orang-utans slightly more distantly related.

The apes, which performed the tests in animal sanctuaries in Africa and Indonesia, were closer to the toddlers in tests measuring "physical cognitive skills" involving things such as quantities, the researchers reported in the study published in the journal Science.

In the same journal, other researchers said they showed that apes and monkeys possessed skills such as guessing the intentions of others.

They studied cotton-top tamarins, rhesus macaques and chimpanzees.

Tots More Socially Cognitive Than Apes

By LAURAN NEERGAARD

WASHINGTON (AP) — Toddlers may act up like little apes, but researchers who compared the species concluded a 2-year-old child still has the more sophisticated social learning skills.

In one test, preschoolers who wanted a toy hidden in a trick tube intently copied a scientist's movements to retrieve the prize. Chimps watched the lesson, but then mostly tried to smash or bite open the tube. When it came to simple math, however, the apes seemed to know more than the youngsters, apparently "adding" how many tasty raisins researchers had hidden.

In a novel study, scientists lured 106 chimpanzees, 32 orangutans and 105 toddlers to sit through five hours of testing over several days. Researchers were trying to tell which innate abilities are distinctly human.

"Human children are not overall more intelligent than other primates, but instead have specialized skills of social cognition," concluded the lead researcher, Esther Herrmann of Germany's Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. "They learn in a way that chimpanzees don't learn."

But the findings, published in Friday's edition of the journal Science, conflict with other research that suggests the great apes, humans' closest relatives, are quite good at social learning, too. In fact, a second study in the same journal suggests chimps and monkeys have some capacity to infer someone's intentions by their actions. That is pretty complex, human-like thinking.

In that work, the animals sought out food containers that a researcher had grasped purposefully, not just tapped, or a container that he had touched with his elbow when his hands were full, but not one elbowed when his hands were empty.

The chimps and monkeys expected someone to behave rationally and adjusted their own actions accordingly, according to the lead researcher, Justin Wood of Harvard University.

"That shows quite a subtle social understanding going on in these animals," said Dr. Frans de Waal of Emory University's Yerkes National Primate Research Center, a well-known expert in primate cognition who was not involved in the research published Friday.

Comparing innate abilities can shed light on the evolution of human cognition.

Rather than studying one ability at a time, Herrmann and colleagues devised a battery of tests that they administered to 2 1/2-year-old children and to apes in wildlife sanctuaries in Uganda, Congo and Indonesia.

The apes and children fared equally well on tests of how they understood their physical world. Occasionally, apes did better.

For example, chimps and preschoolers could tell at a glance which dish contained a few more raisins. But when the dishes were covered and extra raisins dropped in, the apes kept better track of which dish had more.

Herrmann speculated that perhaps everyone starts out with ape-level math skills that humans surpass upon learning to count.

Then she tested social learning — communication, imitation and gauging intent from behavior. For example, Herrmann hid a treat under one of three cups and pointed to the right one. Preschoolers were much better at knowing to follow her gestures.

Overall, the preschoolers accomplished social-learning tasks correctly 74 percent of the time, while the apes did only 33 percent of the time.

Herrmann concluded that backs one theory of the evolution of human cognition, that specialized social skills more than general intelligence explain why humans learn more, in complex cultural groups, than do other primates.

But to de Waal, the preschoolers just had to imitate another human to pass these tests, while the apes had to imitate a stranger of another species, a higher hurdle.

Herrmann chose orphaned apes raised around humans to minimize those concerns.

Other studies have found that chimps pass similar social-learning tests when they know the human tester well or when a fellow chimp is trained to administer the tests, which is the method Yerkes now uses.

Recall the trick tube that Herrmann's apes could not open right? De Waal trained two chimps from different families to open a trick box in different ways and then sent them home. Later, their relatives mostly opened the box the way their matriarch had been trained, similar to human cultural learning.

Social learning is "maybe not as a perfect as in humans, but it's very well-developed," de Waal said.

viernes, 7 de septiembre de 2007

Higher social skills are distinctly human, toddler and ape study reveals




Apes bite and try to break a tube to retrieve the food inside while children follow the experimenter's example to get inside the tube to retrieve the prize, showing that even before preschool, toddlers are more sophisticated in their social learning skills than their closest primate relatives, according to a report published in the 7 September issue of the journal Science, published by AAAS, the nonprofit science society.

This innate proficiency allows them to excel in both physical and social skills as they begin school and progress through life.

"We compared three species to determine which abilities and skills are distinctly human," explained Esther Herrmann of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany and lead author of the research paper. Humans differ from their great ape relatives because human brains are about three times the size of the closest primate relatives and humans have language, symbolic math and scientific reasoning.



Esther Herrmann and colleagues compared 105 2-year-old human children, 106 chimpanzees and 32 organutans in a comprehensive battery of physical and social cognitive tests.
Click here for more information.

"Social cognition skills are critical for learning," Herrmann said. The children were much better than the apes in understanding nonverbal communications, imitating another's solution to a problem and understanding the intentions of others," she said.

This is the first comprehensive test comparing social and physical skills of children, chimpanzees and orangutans, Herrmann explained, adding that the findings provide important insight into the evolution of human cognition.

The findings support the cultural intelligence hypothesis that suggests that humans have distinctive social cognitive skills to interact in cultural groups, Herrmann said. An alternate hypothesis suggests that humans differ from apes uniformly across physical and social cognitive tasks because they have more general intelligence.

About 230 subjects – chimps, orangutans and 2.5 year-old children – were compared using a battery of tests and found all to be about equal in the physical cognitive skills of space, quantities and causality. In the social skills of communication, social learning and theory-of-mind skills, the children were correct in about 74 percent of the trials, while the two ape species were correct only about 33 percent of the time.

The researchers chose to study children at an age when they have about the same physical skill level of chimpanzees. Children at 2.5 years are old enough to handle these tasks and people have not taught them too much so they provide a good comparison, Herrmann said. The apes ranged in age from 3 to 21.

All of the subjects – about 100 chimps (Pan troglodytes), 100 children (Homo sapiens) and 30 of the more evolutionarily distant orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus) – were given the same cognitive tests that the Max Planck group developed and named the Primate Cognition Test Battery. The battery analyzes primate cognition dealing with the physical and social world (involved in foraging, for example) and was developed based on the primate cognition research of coauthors Josep Call of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and Michael Tomasello of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.

In one example of the social learning tasks, a researcher demonstrated how to pop open a plastic tube to retrieve food or a toy inside. The children watched and copied. The chimps and orangutans did not imitate the researcher and instead tried to break the tube or pull the contents out with their teeth.

The tests took between three and five hours and were spread between five and eight days over two weeks. The apes were tested in the sanctuaries where they live in Africa and Indonesia.

The researchers plan to test other closely related species with the Primate Cognition Test Battery to map out the evolution of cognitive ability through systematically testing a variety of primate species and eventually comparing their genomes as they become available.

###

"Humans Have Evolved Specialized Skills of Social Cognition: The Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis," by Esther Herrmann, Josep Call, Brian Hare and Michael Tomasello of Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany; María Victoria Hernández-Lloreda at Universidad Complutense de Madrid in Madrid, Spain; and Brian Hare at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina.

The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) is the world's largest general scientific society, and publisher of the journal Science (www.sciencemag.org). AAAS was founded in 1848, and serves 262 affiliated societies and academies of science, reaching 10 million individuals. Science has the largest paid circulation of any peer-reviewed general science journal in the world, with an estimated total readership of 1 million. The nonprofit AAAS (www.aaas.org) is open to all and fulfills its mission to "advance science and serve society" through initiatives in science policy; international programs; science education; and more. For the latest research news, log onto EurekAlert!, www.eurekalert.org, the premier science-news Web site, a service of AAAS.

Researchers head to Congo to study Bonobo psychology

mongabay.com
5-sep-2007

Researchers have gone to the Democratic Republic of Congo to study the social behavior of bonobos -- a close relative of the chimpanzee -- in the Lola ya Bonobo Sanctuary in Kinshasa.

Vanessa Woods, an author and a participant in the study, will be posting daily updates at her Bonobo Handshake Blog.

"We're always comparing ourselves to chimpanzees, but they're only half the picture," said Woods. "Bonobos and chimpanzees are so opposite in many ways, that we really need to understand bonobos if we're ever going to understand ourselves."

Woods and her colleagues from the Max Planck Institute in Germany will look at cooperation, play behavior and altruistic characteristics in the primates.



Woods and a captive bonobo
"A lot of our experiments look silly, like when I throw a bright red soccer ball back and forth, or wave a red porcupine around. But a lot of these games help us understand the way bonobos think. Are they as obsessed with objects as we are? Are they scared of new things?"

Bonobos are smaller than chimps and live in female-dominated societies. They are widely known for the prominent role that sex plays in conflict resolution.

Because the researchers are studying psychology, they can observe bonobos in the unnatural setting of a 35 hectare forest reserve in Kinshasa.