jueves, 28 de febrero de 2008

Chimp and human communication trace to same brain region


An area of the brain involved in the planning and production of spoken and signed language in humans plays a similar role in chimpanzee communication, researchers report online on February 28th in the journal Current Biology, a publication of Cell Press.

“Chimpanzee communicative behavior shares many characteristics with human language,” said Jared Taglialatela of the Yerkes National Primate Research Center. “The results from this study suggest that these similarities extend to the way in which our brains produce and process communicative signals.”

The results also suggest that the “neurobiological foundations” of human language may have been present in the common ancestor of modern humans and chimpanzees, he said.

Scientists had identified Broca’s area, located in part of the human brain known as the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), as one of several critical regions that light up with activity when people plan to say something and when they actually talk or sign. Anatomically, Broca’s area is most often larger on the left side of the brain, and imaging studies in humans had shown left-leaning patterns of brain activation during language-related tasks, the researchers said.

“We didn’t know if or to what extent other primates, and particularly humans’ closest ancestor, the chimpanzees, possess a comparable region involved in the production of their own communicative signals,” Taglialatela said.

In the new study, the researchers non-invasively scanned the brains of three chimpanzees as they gestured and called to a person in request for food that was out of their reach. Those chimps showed activation in the brain region corresponding to Broca’s area and in other areas involved in complex motor planning and action in humans, the researchers found.

The findings might be interpreted in one of two ways, Taglialatela said.

“One interpretation of our results is that chimpanzees have, in essence, a ‘language-ready brain,’ ” he said. “By this, we are suggesting that apes are born with and use the brain areas identified here when producing signals that are part of their communicative repertoire.

“Alternatively, one might argue that, because our apes were captive-born and producing communicative signals not seen often in the wild, the specific learning and use of these signals ‘induced’ the pattern of brain activation we saw. This would suggest that there is tremendous plasticity in the chimpanzee brain, as there is in the human brain, and that the development of certain kinds of communicative signals might directly influence the structure and function of the brain.”

###

The researchers include Jared P. Taglialatela, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, GA, Department of Natural Sciences, Clayton State University, Morrow, GA; Jamie L. Russell, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, GA; Jennifer A. Schaeffer, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, GA; and William D. Hopkins, Yerkes National Primate Research Center, Atlanta, GA, Department of Psychology, Agnes Scott College, Decatur, GA.

martes, 12 de febrero de 2008

Upcoming Primate Meetings

5TH ANNUAL ASSESSMENT AND TREATMENT OF PAIN AND DISTRESS IN ANIMALS (ATOP V)
Date: February 8, 2008
Sponsor: The AWEN Group
Location: Massachusetts Medical Society Conference Center at Waltham Woods, Waltham, MA
Web Site: http://www.theawengroup.com/ATOPV_info.html

BEHAVIOUR AND INDIVIDUALITY IN PRIMATES AND OTHER MAMMALS
Dates: March 17, 2008 - March 18, 2008
Sponsor: Lusófona University
Location: Auditorium Agostinho da Silva, Lusófona University, Lisbon, Portugal
Web Site: http://behavior-individuality.blogspot.com/

2ND BRITISH ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY TROPICAL ECOLOGY GROUP
Dates: March 18, 2008 - March 19, 2008
Sponsor: British Ecological Society Tropical Ecology Group
Location: University of Oxford, UK
Web Site: http://www.besteg.org/earlycareer.html

IACUC 101
Date: March 26, 2008
Sponsor: Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare, NIH
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Web Site: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/iacuc101s.htm

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGISTS ANNUAL MEETING
Dates: April 7, 2008 - April 13, 2008
Sponsor: American Association of Physical Anthropologists
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Web Site: http://www.physanth.org/annmeet/

3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRIMATE GENOMICS: PRIMATE GENOMICS AND HUMAN DISEASE
Dates: April 13, 2008 - April 16, 2008
Sponsor: University of Washington
Location: Seattle, Washington
Web Site: http://www.seattleprimategenomics.com

31ST MEETING OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PRIMATOLOGISTS
Dates: June 18, 2008 - June 21, 2008
Sponsor: American Society of Primatologists
Location: West Palm Beach, Florida
Web Site: http://www.asp.org/asp2008/index.htm

REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL ENRICHMENT CONFERENCES: IPS 2008 PRE-TRAINING WORKSHOP
Dates: July 30, 2008 - August 3, 2008
Sponsor: Regional Environmental Enrichment Conferences
Location: Edinburgh Zoo, Edinburgh, Scotland
Web Site: http://www.reec.info/IPS2008.htm

XXIIND IPS CONGRESS
Dates: August 3, 2008 - August 8, 2008
Sponsor: Primate Society of Great Britain
Location: Edinburgh International Conference Centre in Edinburgh, Scotland
Web Site: http://www.ips2008.co.uk/index.html

ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ANIMAL BEHAVIOR SOCIETY
Dates: August 14, 2008 - August 19, 2008
Sponsor: Animal Behavior Society
Location: Snowbird, Colorado
Web Site: http://abs.animalbehavior.org/

MEASURING BEHAVIOR 2008: 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON METHODS AND TECHNIQUES IN BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH
Dates: August 26, 2008 - August 29, 2008
Sponsor: Noldus
Location: Maastricht, The Netherlands
Web Site: http://www.noldus.webaxxs.net/mb2008/

2008 AAZK NATIONAL CONFERENCE
Dates: September 24, 2008 - September 28, 2008
Sponsor: American Association of Zoo Keepers
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Web Site: http://www.utahaazk.org/national.htm

ASSOCIATION OF PRIMATE VETERINARIANS
Dates: November 5, 2008 - November 8, 2008
Sponsor: Association of Primate Veterinarians
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana
Web Site: http://www.primatevets.org/

59TH AALAS NATIONAL MEETING
Dates: November 9, 2008 - November 13, 2008
Sponsor: AALAS
Location: Indianapolis, Indiana

SCIENTISTS CENTER FOR ANIMAL WELFARE (SCAW) WINTER CONFERENCE
Dates: December 1, 2008 - December 2, 2008
Sponsor: Scientists Center for Animal Welfare (SCAW)
Location: San Antonio, TX
Web Site: http://www.scaw.com/conference.htm

THE 26TH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM FOR NONHUMAN PRIMATE MODELS FOR AIDS
Dates: December 9, 2008 - December 12, 2008
Sponsor: Wisconsin National Primate Research Center and Caribbean Primate Research Center
Location: The Ritz-Carlton, San Juan Hotel, San Juan, Puerto Rico
Web Site: http://nhp2008.primate.wisc.edu

miércoles, 6 de febrero de 2008

New Monkey Species Found in Remote Amazon


A new species of uakari monkey, seen above, was recently found in a mountainous region of the Amazon by a New Zealand primatologist. The animal, dubbed Cacajao ayresii, lives outside protected lands and is hunted by locals, prompting the expert to call the newfound creature "quite vulnerable."

Photograph by Italo Mourthe


Fuente: National Geographic

lunes, 4 de febrero de 2008

CURSOS ETOLOGIA DE PRIMATES


Cursos de Etología de Primates en Fundación Mona PRIMER SEMESTRE 2008

Fundación Mona (www.fundacionmona.org) organizará durante el primer semestre de 2008 nuevas convocatorias de cursos de Etología de Primates. El objetivo fundamental de estos cursos es estudiar y comprender el comportamiento de los primates no humanos, no tan solo desde una vertiente teórica sino también práctica. Así, dedicaremos el 45% del tiempo a la práctica de observación etológica de los animales alojados en el Centro de Recuperación de Primates de la Fundación Mona, y un 55% a la teoría.


Disponemos de tres niveles de formación: básico (nivel 1), intermedio (nivel 2) y avanzado (nivel 3). No se podrá acceder a los niveles 2 y 3 sin haber cursado previamente los niveles inferiores.

La duración estimada de cada curso es de 15 horas (8,5 de teoría y 6,5 de práctica) distribuidas en dos únicos días intensivos (viernes y sábado), y se llevarán a cabo a partir del próximo mes de marzo de 2008. El horario será de 10:00h a 18:30h. El precio de la inscripción incluye carpeta con libreta de campo, material en CD-ROM y certificado de aprovechamiento del curso.

Próximas convocatorias primer semestre de 2008 (Niveles 1 i 2):

Mes convocatoria

Nivel 1

Nivel 2

Nivel 3

Marzo

21-22

-

-

Abril

25-26

-

-

Mayo

23-24

30-31

-

Junio

20-21

27-28

-


Precios de la formación:


Tipo de tarifa

Nivel 1

Nivel 2

Nivel 3

General

94€

95€

Estudiante

83€

85€

Socio FM

73€

75€

Padrino FM

63€

65€

Voluntario, exvoluntario FM

31€

35€



Lugar de Formación:

Fundación Mona

Carretera de Cassà, 1km

17457 – Riudellots de la Selva, Girona

España



Para más información y reservas:

Persona de contacto: Miquel Llorente

Correo electrónico: recerca@fundacionmona.org (forma de contacto preferente)

tel: 972 477 618



martes, 18 de diciembre de 2007

Gene Implicated In Human Language Affects Song Learning In Songbirds




Zebra finch. (Credit: iStockphoto/David Gluzman)

ScienceDaily (Dec. 5, 2007) — Do special "human" genes provide the biological substrate for uniquely human traits, like language?

Genetic aberrations of the human FoxP2 gene impair speech production and comprehension, yet the relative contributions of FoxP2 to brain development and function are unknown.

Songbirds are a useful model to address this because, like human youngsters, they learn to vocalize by imitating the sounds of their elders.

Previously, Dr. Constance Sharff and colleagues found that, when young zebra finches learn to sing or when adult canaries change their song seasonally, FoxP2 is up-regulated in Area X, a brain region important for song learning.

Dr. Sebastian Haesler, Dr. Scharff, and colleagues experimentally reduce FoxP2 levels in Area X before zebra finches started to learn their song. They used a virus-mediated RNA interference for the first time in songbird brains.

The birds, with lowered levels of FoxP2, imitated their tutor's song imprecisely and sang more variably than controls.

FoxP2 thus appears to be critical for proper song development.

These results suggest that humans and birds may employ similar molecular substrates for vocal learning, which can now be further analyzed in an experimental animal system.

Journal citation: Haesler S, Rochefort C, Georgi B, Licznerski P, Osten P, et al. (2007) Incomplete and inaccurate vocal imitation after knockdown of FoxP2 in songbird basal ganglianucleus Area X. PLoS Biol 5(12): e321. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050321

Adapted from materials provided by Public Library of Science.

Adapting To Pregnancy Played Key Role In Human Evolution, Study Shows




ScienceDaily (Dec. 13, 2007) — When a pregnant woman leans back, and shifts her weight to stand more comfortably, she is performing a motion that for millions of years has helped to compensate for the strain and weight of childbearing on the body. According to a new study from researchers at Harvard University and the University of Texas at Austin, women's lower spines evolved to be more flexible and supportive than men's to increase comfort and mobility during pregnancy, and to accommodate the special biology of carrying a baby for nine months while standing on two feet.

The study, published in the Dec. 13 Nature, was led by Katherine Whitcome, a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Anthropology in Harvard's Faculty of Arts and Sciences, with Daniel Lieberman, professor of anthropology at Harvard, and Liza Shapiro, associate professor of anthropology of the University of Texas at Austin.

"Pregnancy presents an enormous challenge for the female body," says Whitcome. "The body must change in dramatic ways to accommodate the baby, and these changes affect a woman's stability and posture. It turns out that enhanced curvature and reinforcement of the lower spine are key to maintaining normal activities during pregnancy."

It has long been appreciated that giving birth to large-brained infants has influenced human pelvic shape, but there has been little attention paid to the major challenge that pregnant bipedal mothers endure when holding up an enormous fetus and placenta well in front of the hip joints. The study is the first of its kind to examine the evolutionary mechanisms that allow women to carry a baby to term, and the way that women's bodies compensate for increased weight in the abdomen during pregnancy.

Walking on two feet, which happened early in human evolution, presents a unique challenge during pregnancy because the center of gravity shifts far in front of the hips, destabilizing the upper body and impairing locomotion. This is not the case for animals that walk predominantly on four legs such as chimpanzees, or even other bipeds.

To accommodate this shifted center of gravity, women's spines have evolved to help offset the additional weight in the abdomen during pregnancy, so that the back muscles are not taxed in counter-balancing the destabilizing effects of the baby's weight.

In both women and men the curvature of the spine in the lower back, called the lordosis, stabilizes the upper body above the lower body. The researchers studied 19 pregnant women between the ages of 20 and 40, and found that when naturally standing, the women lean back, increasing their lordosis by as much as 60 percent by the end of their term. In doing so, pregnant women maintain a stable center of gravity above the hips.

The research also demonstrates, for the first time, that human lumbar vertebrae differ between males and females in ways that decrease the shearing forces that the lumbar extension of pregnancy places on the lower back in pregnant mothers.

"In females, the lordosis is subtly different than that of males, because the curvature extends across three vertebrae, while the male lordosis curves across only two vertebrae," says Whitcome. "Loading across three vertebrae allows an expectant mother to increase her lordosis, realigning her center of gravity above her hips and offsetting the destabilizing weight of the baby."

In addition to the difference in the number of vertebrae across which the lordosis spans, the female joints are relatively larger and flare out further down the spine than those of males improving the spine's strength. All of this contributes to an increased ability to extend the spine, so that the woman can lean back, realign the body's center of gravity, and safely maintain a more stable position. These differences in the lower back may even reinforce her capability to support and carry her baby in her arms after the baby has been born.

When human ancestors first became bipedal, they set the human lineage off on a different evolutionary path from other apes, but in so doing created special challenges for pregnant mothers. One exciting discovery is that the ability of human females to better carry a baby to term while standing on two feet appears to have evolved at least two million years ago. The researchers studied two hominin fossils that were approximately two million years old, one of which - presumably a female - displayed three lordosis vertebrae and one of which - presumably a male - displayed fewer.

"Early human women lived very strenuous, active lives, and pregnant females were forced to cope with the discomfort of childbearing while foraging for food and escaping from predators," Lieberman says. "This evolution of the lower back helped early woman to remain more mobile during pregnancy, which would have been essential to survival, and appears to have been favored by natural selection."

The research was funded by the National Science Foundation, the L.S.B. Leakey Foundation, and the American School of Prehistoric Research.

Adapted from materials provided by Harvard University.

Ape To Human: Walking Upright May Have Protected Heavy Human Babies




For safety, all nonhuman primates carry their young clinging to their fur from birth, and species survival depends on it. (Credit: iStockphoto/Graeme Purdy)

ScienceDaily (Dec. 17, 2007) — The transition from apes to humans may have been partially triggered by the need to stand on two legs, in order to safely carry heavier babies. This theory of species evolution presented by Lia Amaral from the University of São Paulo in Brazil has just been published online in Springer’s journal, Naturwissenschaften.

For safety, all nonhuman primates carry their young clinging to their fur from birth, and species survival depends on it. The carrying pattern changes as the infant grows. Newborns are carried clinging to their mother’s stomach, often with additional support. Months later, infants are carried over the adult body usually on the mother’s back, and this carrying pattern lasts for years in apes. However, this necessity to carry infants safely imposes limits on the weight of the infants.

Through a detailed mechanical analysis of how different types of apes - gibbons, orangutans and gorillas - carry their young, looking at the properties of ape hair, infant grip, adult hair density and carrying position, Amaral demonstrates a relationship between infant weight, hair friction and body angle which ensures ape infants are carried safely.

Amaral also shows how the usual pattern of primate carrying of heavy infants is incompatible with bipedalism. African apes have to persist with knuckle-walking on all fours, or ‘quadruped’ position, in order to stop their young from slipping off their backs.

The author goes on to suggest that the fall in body hair in primates could have brought on bipedality as a necessary consequence, through the strong selective pressure of safe infant carrying, as infants were no longer able to cling to their mother’s body hairs. In the author’s opinion, safe carrying of heavy infants justified the emergence of the biped form of movement. Although an adult gorilla is much heavier than an adult human, its offspring is only half the weight of a human baby.

Amaral concludes that this evolution to bipedality has important consequences for the female of the species. Indeed, it frees the arms and hands of males and juveniles, but females have their arms and hands occupied with their young. This restriction of movement placed limits on food gathering for biped females carrying their infants, and may have been at the origin of group cooperation.

Reference: Amaral LQ (2007). Mechanical analysis of infant carrying in hominoids. Naturwissenschaften (DOI 10.1007/s00114-007-0325-0).

Adapted from materials provided by Springer.